Understanding PPE Standards in the EU – A Practical Guide for Buyers and Suppliers
- Martyn-Drage
- Sep 30
- 2 min read
Updated: Oct 11
In the EU, not all PPE is created equal. While many products claim to provide protection, only those that comply with harmonised European standards and bear the CE mark are legally marketable. For buyers and suppliers, knowing the standards behind PPE is vital for making informed choices.
The Three Categories of PPE
EU legislation classifies PPE into three categories based on risk level:
Category I – Simple PPE (e.g., sunglasses, gardening gloves). Self-certification by the manufacturer is sufficient.
Category II – Intermediate PPE (e.g., safety helmets, high-visibility clothing). Requires testing by a Notified Body.
Category III – Complex PPE (e.g., fall arrest systems, respiratory protection, chemical protective suits). Requires rigorous testing, quality assurance, and ongoing audits.
Role of Harmonised Standards
Harmonised European Standards (EN standards) provide technical details to help manufacturers demonstrate compliance. Examples include:
EN ISO 20471 - High visibility clothing
EN 388 – Protective gloves against mechanical risks
EN 343 – Protective clothing – protection against rain
Using harmonised standards isn’t mandatory, but they provide a “presumption of conformity,” making compliance easier and more robust.
Responsibilities Across the Supply Chain
Manufacturers – Must design, test, and document PPE compliance.
Importers – Must verify that PPE entering the EU complies with all regulations.
Distributors – Must ensure products are correctly CE marked and accompanied by user instructions.
Tips for Buyers and Safety Managers
Always ask for the EU Declaration of Conformity.
Check the CE marking and Notified Body number (for Category III).
Verify compliance with the relevant EN standards.
Bottom Line: Understanding PPE standards helps ensure that workers are not only compliant but truly protected. Investing in compliant PPE is an investment in workplace safety, legal security, and operational reliability.
_edited.png)




Comments